Safety and effectiveness evaluation of a uterine direct visualization system in induced abortion. A multicenter clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: While the decision of abortion is undeniably complex, there are situations where it becomes a necessary choice. In such circumstances, a secure abortion procedure is essential to safeguard the physical and mental well-being of women. A uterine direct visualization system was designed to fulfill the requirements and this study undertook an assessment of the system's safety and effectiveness within a medical facility setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Induced abortion requested women in 17 institutions across the country between December 2016 and February 2017 were enrolled. Subjects were separated to the study and control group randomly. Induced abortion was conducted by a uterine direct visualization system and an ultrasound-guided system in the study and control group, respectively. The clinical indexes collected during intra- and post-procedures were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 392 and 339 subjects were included in the study and control group, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between two groups. Subjects in the study group had significant smaller number of uterine cavity entry (p < 0.001), less 2-h and 14-days postoperative bleeding (all p < 0.001), and less 14-days postoperative abdominal pain (p < 0.001). Significantly higher ratio of normal menstruation, in terms of incidence and duration after 60-days of operation, was observed in the study group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Induced abortion with uterine direct visualization system generate better outcome and less complication than the conventional ultrasound-guided abortion procedures.

The FDA in the Crosshairs-Science, Politics, and Abortion.

In this Viewpoint, the Supreme Court case FDA v AHM is used to illustrate the tension the FDA faces between science and politics, and state authority over abortion vs federal authority over which drugs may be marketed nationwide.

Understanding medication abortion ineligibility due to gestational age among a cohort of patients in Southern California.

OBJECTIVE: Medication abortion (MAB) is safe and effective up to 77 days gestation. Limited data are available on how often patients are ineligible for MAB due to advanced gestational age and how many of those ineligible go on to receive procedural abortion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of electronic health records from Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest (PPPSW) from January - December 2021. PPPSW has four procedural abortion sites and 15 MAB-only clinics that offered appointments only if last menstrual period-based GA was ≤70 days or unknown. Patients >70 days gestation by intake ultrasound at a MAB-only clinic were referred to a procedural center. RESULTS: Of 11,684 patients presenting for MAB at MAB-only sites 2224 (19%) did not receive a MAB; 3.8% (N = 444) presented past 70 days gestation and were thus ineligible due to gestational age limits. Of those ineligible (N = 444), 234 (53%) measured between 71-77 days of gestation. Three quarters (75.7%) of those ineligible went on to receive a procedural abortion at PPPSW after a mean wait time of 10 days. In multivariable analysis, no demographic factors were associated with higher odds of receiving a procedural abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Presenting for MAB past a gestational age limit was uncommon, supporting safety of no-test MAB protocols. A quarter of people ineligible for MAB due to gestational age did not receive a procedural abortion at PPPSW. If MAB were offered up to 77 days, half of patients who were denied MAB due to gestational age could have received MAB, expanding patient access. IMPLICATIONS: Being ineligible for MAB due to advanced gestational age was uncommon. Increasing MAB gestational age limits from 70 days to 77 days could further improve abortion access.

Acces to abortion in the Grand Est region in 2023 / L'accès à l'interruption volontaire de grossesse dans la région Grand Est en 2023

Objectives: Although access to abortion is a national priority in France, there is little documented evidence that it is actually respected. In the Grand Est region, the 2021­2023 plan for access to abortion includes a review of family planning practices and health care provision, to update the 2019 report. It raises the question of access to abortion in all its dimensions, and aims to implement improvement actions best suited to the region's problems. Method: An online questionnaire was sent to hospitals, local perinatal centers, sexual health centers, and independent professionals with presumed family planning activity. Of those who responded, only those with actual family planning activity were included. Results: The five-day deadline for the first appointment recommended by the HAS can be met by 73% of those surveyed. During pre- or post-abortion consultations, a psychosocial interview is offered to 92% of patients, and the detection of violence to 97%. Although 14 hospitals (38%) have extended their abortion access time to 16 weeks of amenorrhea, the number of facilities handling abortions beyond 13 weeks of amenorrhea has fallen since 2019. In primary care, 70% of private practitioners and 61% of sexual health centers offer abortions up to 9 weeks of amenorrhea. Conclusions: Access to abortion has weakened in the Grand Est region between 2019 and 2023. New laws and regulations could be a lever for improvement, provided that the professionals involved are given the means.

Objectifs: Si l'accès à l'IVG est une priorité nationale en France, son respect effectif n'est que peu documenté. Dans le Grand Est, le plan d'accès à l'IVG 2021-2023 inclut la réalisation d'un état des lieux des pratiques et de l'offre de soins en orthogénie, pour actualiser celui de 2019. Il pose la question de l'accès à l'IVG dans toutes ses dimensions et vise la mise en place des actions d'amélioration les plus adaptées aux problématiques de la région. Méthodes: Un questionnaire en ligne a été envoyé aux centres hospitaliers, aux centres périnataux de proximité, aux centres de santé sexuelle et aux professionnels libéraux ayant une activité d'orthogénie supposée. Parmi ceux qui y ont répondu, seuls ceux qui avaient une activité d'orthogénie effective ont été inclus. Résultats: Le délai de premier rendez-vous de cinq jours recommandés par l'HAS peut être respecté par 73 % des enquêtés. Lors des consultations pré- ou post-IVG, un entretien psychosocial est proposé à 92 % et un repérage des violences à 97 %. Bien que 14 centres hospitaliers (38 %) aient allongé leur délai d'accès à l'IVG jusqu'à 16 SA, le nombre d'établissements prenant en charge les IVG au-delà de 13 semaines d'aménorrhée a baissé depuis 2019. En médecine de ville, 70 % des professionnels libéraux et 61 % des CSS ont une offre IVG allant jusqu'à 9 SA. Conclusions: L'accès à l'IVG s'est fragilisé dans le Grand Est entre 2019 et 2023. Les nouvelles lois et réglementations pourraient être un levier d'amélioration à condition que des moyens soient donnés aux professionnels impliqués.

Has the introduction of increased genetic prenatal testing affected rates of termination of pregnancy due to fetal abnormality?

OBJECTIVE: Genetic high-resolution analyses and improved diagnostic imaging have impacted the ability to detect fetal disorders. It is unknown if this resulted in an alteration in the number of terminations of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies (TOPFA). The objective was to describe the incidence and indication of TOPFA. METHODS: A descriptive study based on records from the Regional Abortion Council in the Central Denmark Region from 2008 to 2021 consisting of 1895 TOPFA. RESULTS: A consistent incidence of TOPFA was observed, accounting for 0.96% of the total births during that period. When examining fetal indications, there was a small increase in the occurrence of genetic aberrations, primarily caused by deletions, duplications, and single nucleotide variations, whereas the number of chromosomal aberrations remained stable. Of 35.5% of the cases with malformations, the central nervous system was the most affected organ system, followed by malformations of the heart 29.6%. Overall, the total number of cases remained stable. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly, despite the development of new diagnostic tools, the incidence of TOPFA from 2008 to 2021 remained stable. However, the number of cases with genetic aberrations increased. This may be attributed to increased genetic testing for fetuses with identified malformations, resulting in more accurate diagnoses.

Effectiveness and safety of telehealth medication abortion in the USA.

Telehealth abortion has become critical to addressing surges in demand in states where abortion remains legal but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is limited. California Home Abortion by Telehealth (CHAT) is a prospective study that follows pregnant people who obtained medication abortion via telehealth from three virtual clinics operating in 20 states and Washington, DC between April 2021 and January 2022. Individuals were screened using a standardized no-test protocol, primarily relying on their medical history to assess medical eligibility. We assessed effectiveness, defined as complete abortion after 200 mg mifepristone and 1,600 µg misoprostol (or lower) without additional intervention; safety was measured by the absence of serious adverse events. We estimated rates using multivariable logistic regression and multiple imputation to account for missing data. Among 6,034 abortions, 97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 97.2-98.1%) were complete without subsequent known intervention or ongoing pregnancy after the initial treatment. Overall, 99.8% (99.6-99.9%) of abortions were not followed by serious adverse events. In total, 0.25% of patients experienced a serious abortion-related adverse event, 0.16% were treated for an ectopic pregnancy and 1.3% abortions were followed by emergency department visits. There were no differences in effectiveness or safety between synchronous and asynchronous models of care. Telehealth medication abortion is effective, safe and comparable to published rates of in-person medication abortion care.

Outcomes After Induction of Labor Compared With Dilation and Evacuation for the Management of Rupture of Membranes in the Second Trimester.

Previable and periviable rupture of membranes is associated with significant morbidity for the pregnant patient. For those who have a choice of options and undergo active management, it is not known how the risks of induction of labor compare with those for dilation and evacuation (D&E). We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with rupture of membranes between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation who opted for active management. Adverse events (52.2% vs 16.9%, P <.01) and time to uterine evacuation greater than 24 hours (26.7% vs 9.6%, P =.01) were more common among patients undergoing induction of labor. In a multivariable regression, induction of labor was an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio 5.70, 95% CI, 2.35-13.82) compared with D&E. Severe complications were rare across both groups (4.4% for patients undergoing induction vs 2.6% for D&E, P =.63). Given the differing risks by termination method, access to D&E is an important treatment option for this patient population.

Supported at-home abortion: An exploratory study of methods, outcomes, and motivations of community-led abortion care in the United States and Canada.

OBJECTIVES: This an exploratory study aimed to describe methods and outcomes of comprehensive community-led abortion care in the United States and Canada. STUDY DESIGN: This community-based participatory research study recruited community abortion providers from the United States and Canada through existing confidential networks. They participated through in-person and online collaboration to design and implement a data collection tool for abortion methods, outcomes, and motivations from clients. We implemented significant security measures to protect participant confidentiality. RESULTS: Thirty community providers were recruited, five withdrew, and 12 provided data for 167 at-home abortions. Most abortions occurred between 6 and 10 weeks (104 [62%]). Abortions between 13 and 21 weeks represent 39 cases (23%). Misoprostol only was the most common method (n = 125 [75%]), followed by herbs alone (n = 12 [7%]) and aspiration (n = 12 [7%]). Complications were rare (n = 3 [1.8%]), with 163 complete abortions (98%). The primary motivation for seeking community-led abortion care was avoiding a clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Community providers employed various abortion methods with safety and effectiveness profiles comparable to those reported for clinical and community-based abortion care. Clients wanting a different model of abortion care seek out community-led abortions, regardless of whether clinics are legal and accessible. IMPLICATIONS: Community-led abortion is a viable choice for patients. Community providers should be recognized for their contributions to abortion access and high-quality, person-centered care. This study demonstrates a broader range of abortion providers and diverse options meeting the need for individualized abortion care.

Effects of aromatherapy on patient satisfaction with procedural abortion at less than 10 weeks' gestation: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare satisfaction with procedural abortion prior to 10 weeks' gestation in patients randomized to lavender essential oil aromatherapy vs placebo (jojoba oil). STUDY DESIGN: This randomized trial compared lavender aromatherapy vs placebo in patients undergoing procedural abortion <10 weeks' gestation. Participants self-administered and inhaled oil during their procedures. Our primary outcome was composite mean score on the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Participants completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, a visual analog scale reporting maximum procedural pain, and reported postprocedure aromatherapy acceptability. RESULTS: We analyzed 112 participants randomized to aromatherapy (n = 57) vs placebo (n = 55). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. We found no difference in overall satisfaction (mean Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale scores aromatherapy: 0.72 ± 0.96 vs placebo: 0.46 ± 0.98, p = 0.17) or maximum procedural pain (median visual analog scale score aromatherapy: 65 [range: 4-95] vs placebo: 63 [range: 7-97], p = 0.91). Independent predictors of satisfaction included the use of oral sedation (B: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.04-0.69), state anxiety (B: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.79 to -0.10), and maximum procedural pain (B: -0.17; 95% CI: -0.25 to -0.09). The aromatherapy participants were significantly more likely to have found inhaling scented oil helpful during their procedure (71.9% vs 45.5%; p = 0.005) and would recommend it to a friend who needed a procedural abortion (86.0% vs 56.4%; p = 0.0005) compared to those in the placebo group. Additionally, patients in the aromatherapy group were significantly more likely to agree with the statement, "If I need another procedural abortion, I would want to inhale scented oil during my procedure" (87.7% vs 70.9%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive use of lavender aromatherapy during first-trimester procedural abortion does not improve satisfaction with anesthesia but is highly valued by patients. IMPLICATIONS: Oral opioids as an adjunct to standard analgesics during procedural abortion (ibuprofen and paracervical block) do not decrease pain, and nonopioid options are lacking. Given current limited anesthesia options, aromatherapy could serve as an affordable and acceptable nonopioid adjunct to current standard of care during procedural abortion. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04969900.

Experiences with misoprostol-only used for self-managed abortion and acquired from an online or retail pharmacy in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand individual experiences with medication abortion using misoprostol-only among people living in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted 31 semistructured anonymous in-depth interviews with individuals who used misoprostol-only for self-managed medication abortion. Participants were recruited from Aid Access, an online telemedicine organization that provided prescriptions for misoprostol to eligible people in all 50 states in May and June 2020 when a combined mifepristone and misoprostol regimen was unavailable. We coded transcripts with a flexible coding approach and focused on perceptions and experiences with use. RESULTS: Participants were knowledgeable about misoprostol. Previous abortion experiences shaped perceptions of misoprostol-only by allowing comparison to the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen. Most participants expressed an unwavering desire for an effective abortion method, regardless of the medications or regimen. Individual physical experiences with misoprostol, including bleeding, cramping, nausea, and diarrhea, varied in intensity and duration. Participants proactively managed symptoms with self-care strategies and drew extensively from their prior experiences with menstruation, miscarriage, abortion, and childbirth. Clear instructions and information on potential complications and what to expect throughout the abortion fostered a sense of preparedness, and personalized interactions with an online help desk brought comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol offered an essential abortion method for study participants. This regimen was physically challenging for some, and there is potentially a greater need for communication and support for individuals using misoprostol-only regimens. Prior reproductive experiences informed participant's knowledge, preparedness, pain management, and ability to both recognize and manage potential complications. IMPLICATIONS: As restrictions on mifepristone continue, more people may use misoprostol-only regimens. All regimens can be supported with detailed instructions, clear expectations, information on signs of potential complications, and personalized support. To achieve reproductive autonomy, people must have access to a range of abortion care options that meet their needs.

Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA): A national representative survey.

OBJECTIVE: Since the U.S. Supreme Court eliminated the federal right to abortion, there is a heightened need to understand public opinion about the criminalization of people who attempt to end their pregnancies outside the formal healthcare setting, referred to as self-managed abortion (SMA). We assessed U.S. attitudes about whether three forms of SMA should be legal, reported or punished: 1) using abortion pills obtained outside the healthcare system, 2) using other medications, drugs, herbs, or by drinking alcohol, and 3) using traumatic methods (inserting an object in their body or hitting their stomach). METHODS: From December 2021 to January 2022, we administered a national probability-based online survey to English- and Spanish-speaking people assigned female (AFAB, ages 15-49) or male at birth (AMAB, ages 18-49) regarding their attitudes about criminalizing SMA, using Ipsos' KnowledgePanel. We estimated weighted proportions and conducted multivariable regression analyses to identify characteristics associated with support for SMA legality and punishment (reporting to authorities, paying a fine or going to jail). RESULTS: A total of 7,016 AFAB and 360 AMAB completed the survey. People were less likely (p < .05) to agree that SMA using abortion pills should be illegal (34% of AFAB and 43% of AMAB) than other forms of SMA (36-48%), although over one-fifth were unsure (AFAB, 20-23% and AMAB, 24-27%). People were less likely to agree SMA using abortion pills should be criminalized than SMA using other drugs, medications, herbs, alcohol or by using traumatic methods. In multivariable analyses, AMAB and Christian religion were associated with agreeing that SMA using abortion pills should be illegal; people who identified as Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity and experienced medical mistreatment were less likely to agree SMA with medication abortion pills should be illegal. CONCLUSIONS: Public support for criminalizing SMA is complex and varied by SMA method and form of punishment.

Progesterone after mifepristone: A pilot prospective single arm clinical trial for women who have changed their mind after commencing medical abortion.

AIM: This pilot study aimed to assess the utility of an oral progesterone treatment protocol for women who commenced medical abortion and then changed their mind and wished instead to maintain their pregnancy. METHODS: The Progesterone-After-Mifepristone-pilot for efficacy and reproducibility (PAMper) trial was designed as a prospective single-arm pilot clinical trial, conducted via telehealth. Women aged 18 to 45 years in Australia who reported ingesting mifepristone within the last 72 h to initiate medical abortion and had not taken misoprostol were included. Initial contact was by a web-based form. Following informed consent, participants were prescribed oral progesterone to be taken 400 mg twice per day for 3 days then 400 mg at night until completion of a 19 day course. Pregnancy viability was assessed by ultrasound scan after 14 days of progesterone treatment. RESULTS: Between October 2020 and June 2021, nine women contacted the PAMper trial, of whom six enrolled and commenced progesterone treatment. These women reported ingesting mifepristone at 40-70 days of gestation, with progesterone being commenced within 5.7-72 h of mifepristone ingestion. Five participants had ongoing, live pregnancies at the primary endpoint (ultrasound at >2 weeks). One participant had a miscarriage after 9 days of progesterone treatment. There were no clinically significant adverse events. CONCLUSION: This small study demonstrated a clinically sound protocol for researching the use of progesterone-after-mifepristone for women in this circumstance. Results of this pilot study support the need for further larger scale trials in this field.

Abortion medical management between 14-16 weeks' amenorrhea after French legislation deadline extension.

BACKGROUND: The National French Assembly promoted a law in 2022 allowing an extension of the period of abortion up to 16 week's amenorrhea. Medication protocols vary internationally, and there are no French data on medical management between 14- and 16-weeks' amenorrhea. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and feasibility of a medical management abortion between 14 and 16 weeks of amenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively collected data from women undergoing medical abortion between 14 and 16 weeks' amenorrhea from April 2022 to April 2023 in Archet's University hospital, Nice, France. Medical protocol consisted in a single dose of oral mifepristone 600 mg and 36-48 h later, vaginal gemeprost 1 mg. Three hours after gemeprost, oral 400 µg of misoprostol were administered every three hours, to a maximum of three doses. Success was defined as fetal expulsion. RESULTS: Thirty women were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine (96.7 %) patients aborted successfully. The median dose of misoprostol required was 800 µg (400 µg -1200 µg) and the median induction-to-abortion interval after first prostaglandin administration was 7 h (5.5-11.6). One patient (3.3 %) didn't expulse the fetus after 3 doses of misoprostol. Nine patients (30.0 %) had additional surgical aspiration for retained product of conception within 24 h. We encountered one post-abortum hemorrhage controlled only with surgical intra uterine aspiration. We did not need complementary hemostatic procedure and we reported no immediate or late complication. CONCLUSIONS: Medical abortion between 14 and 16 weeks of amenorrhea provides a noninvasive and effective management for a daycare mid trimester abortion in 96.7 % of cases, with a 36.7 % of risk of staying in hospital overnight and 30.0 % to have additional surgery for retained product of conception (RPOC).

Comparison of induction-to-expulsion interval during second-trimester medication abortion in pregnancies with anencephaly and other congenital anomalies compared to those without anomalies: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the induction-to-expulsion interval during second-trimester medication abortion in pregnancies complicated by anencephaly or other fetal anomalies is prolonged compared to pregnancies without fetal anomalies STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had second-trimester medication abortion at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). We assigned subjects to one of three groups based on fetal diagnosis: 1) anencephaly group, 2) other congenital anomaly group, and 3) no anomaly group. Data were collected by reviewing patients' charts. We used SPSS version 23 to analyze the data. Simple descriptive analysis and χ2 test were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 303 women had second-trimester medication at 14-28 weeks, of which 58 had anencephaly, 19 had congenital anomalies other than anencephaly, and the remaining 226 had no fetal anomalies. The mean induction-to-expulsion interval was 18.4 hours in the anencephaly group versus 19.4 hours in the other congenital anomaly group versus 19.2 hours in those without anomaly (p-value = 0.924). The 24-hour nonexpulsion rate was also comparable among the groups, with 5.25% rate of nonexpulsion in the anencephaly group versus 15.8% in the other congenital anomaly group versus 11.15% in the no anomaly group (p-value = 0.594). In multivariable regression analysis after controlling for parity, the 24-hour nonexpulsion rate was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, pregnancies undergoing second-trimester medication abortion for fetal anomalies had comparable induction-to-expulsion interval and 24-hour expulsion rates compared to those who had the same procedure for other or no anomalies. IMPLICATIONS: Second-trimester medication abortion procedure length in pregnancies complicated by anencephaly is similar to those pregnancies without anomalies.

Helping patients choose between pain control options for outpatient procedural abortion at less than 12 weeks' gestation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with their chosen pain control regimen for procedural abortion at <12 weeks' gestation in the outpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, we developed an instrument to evaluate predictors of satisfaction with pain control regimens among patients choosing local anesthesia alone (paracervical block with 20 mL of 1% buffered lidocaine) or local anesthesia plus intravenous (IV) moderate sedation with 100 mcg of fentanyl and 2 mg of midazolam. Our primary outcome was to identify predictors of satisfaction with both anesthesia cohorts as measured on a 4-point Likert scale, but due to high satisfaction levels in the IV group, we focused our analysis on the local anesthesia group. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 patients in the local anesthesia group and 155 in the moderate IV sedation group. The mean procedure pain scores were 6.9 (±2.1) out of 10 in the local group and 4.0 (±2.7) in the IV group (p < 0.0001). More women in the IV group (92%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the amount of pain relief they experienced compared to the local group (66%; p < 0.0001). In the univariable model, only being afraid of a minor medical procedure was predictive of less satisfaction with local anesthesia for pain control (relative risk 0.8 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9]). Age, gestational age, anticipated pain, self-reported pain tolerance, self-reported anxiety, discomfort with the abortion decision, and history of prior vaginal or cesarean delivery or induced abortion did not predict satisfaction levels. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of minor medical procedures was the only variable that predicted decreased satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion under 12 weeks. IMPLICATIONS: Reliable predictors for satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion in the outpatient setting remain elusive. Fear of minor medical procedures may serve as an indicator of decreased satisfaction and could be incorporated into patient counseling. Moderate IV sedation is associated with high satisfaction levels.

Impact of approval of home use of misoprostol in England on access to medical abortion: An interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the Department of Health and Social Care in England approved the use of misoprostol at home for early medical abortions, following administration of mifepristone at clinic. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of the approval of home administration of misoprostol in England on access to medical abortion, assessed through proxy measures of the proportion of all abortions that were medical and gestational age. METHODS: This study uses the clinical data from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service on abortions in England in years 2018-2019, containing demographic and procedure characteristics of patients. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis to establish the differences before and after the approval in access to medical abortion, measured by the proportion of all abortions that were medical, and gestational age. The analysis also examined whether these changes were equitable, with focus on area-level deprivation. RESULTS: The analysis of the data (145 529 abortions) suggested that there was an increase in the proportion of medical abortions and decrease in gestational age of abortions after the approval. Compared with the situation if former trends had continued, the actual proportion of early medical abortions was 4.2% higher in December 2019, and the mean gestational age 3.4 days lower. We found that the acceleration of existing trends in increase in proportion of medical abortions and decrease in gestational age were larger in the most deprived quintiles and in those reporting a disability, but not equal across ethnic groups, with Black and Black British women experiencing little change in trajectories post-approval. CONCLUSION: The approval of home use of misoprostol as part of an early medical abortion regimen in England was associated with material and equitable improvements in abortion access. Pre-approval trends toward greater uptake of medical abortion and declining gestational age were accelerated post-approval and were greatest in the most deprived areas of England, but not across all racial/ethnic groups. The present findings strongly support the continuation or introduction of home management of medical abortions.